data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e454/6e45421157e68bf8952a1528d025955e4df63243" alt=""
Sure they were $1700 and are now sold out, but look at them...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1bac/c1bac805100dce4b86956a879dbf41a97a7deb73" alt=""
They are magical.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd54/ffd54d40207b6034a2b8999476f0545e958b404a" alt=""
Well, now I think they are kind of ripped off. And badly, by Gina.
Same attempt at dew-drop like crystals but on tacky tacky gold leather.
Eeeewww!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91674/916748d8eb04de8f2658879e358a8fc7a4c0ab90" alt=""
The pumps are a little better but still. Oh, and the price is not cheap at all. What the heck?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c469/7c469e3131e2f0ed0832e9f2f0d0943fce6b8f18" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca4b/4ca4b40447b5f12f90b445bf7030bf69fefdfaf9" alt=""
I have not really seen any Gina shoes I've liked. The only ones I've ever wanted were the ones pink ankle strap heels Madonna wore on the cover of "Confessions on a Dance Floor." Those were hot.
Plus, even though they are pricier, I always confuse them with Nina shoes. And I think of them as tacky WAG shoes.
Is that wrong?
3 comments:
Here's what I don't get... for 675 pounds and the USD exchange rate, you might as WELL buy the originals. I could understand if the knock-offs were like $150, but they're not. They're within the same price point.
That baffles me
They do look cheap and are not! :-S
When are the designers going to fight this kind of thing more aggressively? It seems like such an open and shut case!
Post a Comment